|
The Prince Tudor theory (also known as Tudor Rose theory) is a variant of the Oxfordian theory of Shakespeare authorship, which asserts that Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford was the true author of the works published under the name of William Shakespeare. The Prince Tudor variant holds that Oxford and Queen Elizabeth I were lovers and had a child who was raised as Henry Wriothesley, 3rd Earl of Southampton. The theory followed earlier arguments that Francis Bacon was a son of the queen. A later version of the theory, known as "Prince Tudor II" states that Oxford was himself a son of the queen, and thus the father of his own half-brother. This hidden history is supposed to explain why Oxford dedicated the narrative poems ''Venus and Adonis'' (1593) and ''The Rape of Lucrece'' (1594) to Southampton and to explain aspects of the poems' contents. The content of Shakespeare's sonnets has also been used to support the theory, as, to a lesser extent, have episodes in the plays. The Prince Tudor theory has created a division among Oxfordians. Many orthodox Oxfordians regard the theory as an impediment to Oxford's recognition as Shakespeare, whereas the Prince Tudor theorists maintain that their theory better explains Oxford's life and the reasons for his writing under a pen name.〔Helen Gordon, ''The Secret Love Story in Shakespeare's Sonnets, second edition''. Philadelphia: Xlibris Publishing Co., 2008; Hank Whittemore, ''The Monument'', Meadow Geese Press, Marshfield Hills, MA, 2005; Paul Streitz, ''Oxford: Son of Queen Elizabeth I'', Oxford Institute Press, 2001〕 ==Background== The theory that the author of Shakespeare's works was connected to a secret romance and child of the queen dates back to the writings of Orville Ward Owen and Elizabeth Wells Gallup, who believed that Francis Bacon was the true author of the plays. In his book ''Sir Francis Bacon's Cipher Story'' (1893–5), Owen claimed to have discovered a secret history of the Elizabethan era hidden in cipher-form in Bacon/Shakespeare's works. According to Owen, Bacon revealed that Elizabeth was secretly married to Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester, who fathered both Bacon himself and Robert Devereux, 2nd Earl of Essex, the latter ruthlessly executed by his own mother in 1601.〔Helen Hackett, ''Shakespeare and Elizabeth: the meeting of two myths'', Princeton University Press, 2009, pp.157–60〕 Bacon was the true heir to the throne of England, but had been excluded from his rightful place. This tragic life-story was the secret hidden in the plays. Elizabeth Gallup developed Owen's views, arguing that a bi-literal cipher, which she had identified in the First Folio of Shakespeare's works, revealed concealed messages confirming that Bacon was the queen's son. This argument was taken up by several other writers, notably C.Y.C. Dawbarn in ''Uncrowned'' (1913) and Alfred Dodd ''The Personal Poems of Francis Bacon'' (1931).〔〔Michael Dobson & Nicola J. Watson, ''England's Elizabeth: An Afterlife in Fame and Fantasy'', Oxford University Press, New York, 2004, p.136.〕 In Dodd's account Bacon was a national redeemer, who, deprived of his ordained public role as monarch, instead performed a spiritual transformation of the nation in private through his work. As he later wrote, "He was born for England, to set the land he loved on new lines, 'to be a Servant to Posterity'".〔Alfred Dodd, ''Francis Bacon's Personal Life Story'', London: Rider, 1950, preface.〕 J. Thomas Looney founded Oxfordian theory in his book ''Shakespeare Identified'' (1920). Looney did not include any arguments about secret marriages or hidden children. However, his theory soon gained adherents who adapted the earlier Baconian arguments to the new Oxfordian position. Looney expressed his disapproval of the development in a letter from 1933, which states that his followers Percy Allen and Bernard M. Ward were "advancing certain views respecting Oxford and Queen Eliz. which appear to me extravagant & improbable, in no way strengthen Oxford’s Shakespeare claims, and are likely to bring the whole cause into ridicule."〔Christopher Paul, "A new letter by J. T. Looney brought to light", ''Shakespeare Oxford Newsletter'', vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 8–9. (PDF )〕〔 Ward's father had been an early supporter of Looney; Allen was a theatre critic. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Prince Tudor theory」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|